An Authors Agenda During World War 1 English Literature Essays

An Authors Agenda During World War 1 English Literature Essays An Authors Agenda During World War 1 English Literature Essay An Authors Agenda During World War 1 English Literature Essay During World War I, Dreiser, being German American, was censured due to his nationality. Dreiser s work and presence were unwelcome in many occasions. During this clip, Dreiser developed a captivation with Dr. Sigmund Freud s work, which led him to go about haunted with detecting what made liquidators tick. At this point Dreiser was desperately contemplating the footing for a novel about a liquidator, a novel he would call An American Tragedy. Dreiser wrote An American Tragedy to convey to acquire inside the tegument of a liquidator, to convey to illume the effects when one as an person has been driven insane seeking to populate up to the criterions society has set for us and commits a offense. Dreiser spent old ages seeking to convey this book to life, but the characters he used neer seemed to come to life. He continued his hunt for a so called American offense, a slaying that served as a metaphor for an unwellness that plagues society. Finally, Dreiser found the perfect slaying. He based his novel on the slaying of Grace Brown by Chester Gillette. Dreiser found something particular about Gillette s instance, non merely did it suit all of his specifications, but Dreiser besides felt a deeper connexion to Gillette. He saw his immature ego in Gillette, immature and in the metropolis, making anything possible to travel up. The intent of this novel is to function as a reminder to immature grownups now, non to allow yourself be consumed by this unwellness brought on us by society, and to be careful what you wish for because you neer know, someday you might acquire it. 4. Discussion Populating in America, one grows up with a mentality that everybody, irrespective of the fortunes you were brought into, can accomplish all the success desirable. Theodore Dreiser uses this doctrine to his advantage. Dreiser is able to open the reader s eyes and turn out that no affair how hard you work, how much you want it, or how much you think you deserve it, the rough world is the bulk of Americans neer reach what they consider success. In the novel An American Tragedy, Theodore Dreiser uses word picture and prefiguration to convey his impossible dream subject. Theodore Dreiser uses word picture to convey his impossible dream subject. When the supporter, Clyde Griffiths was a kid, he neer seemed to be content of who he was or what he had, he ever seemed outa topographic point ( 5 ) . When he and his parents were out on the streets distributing God s word, he ever complained and believed he and his parents looked foolish and less than normal ( 7 ) . Griffiths neer took into consideration all the difficult work that went into seeking to do a life. Griffiths was ever ashamed of his life style, and embarrassed that this was the manner his parents made a life, he believed his life should non be like this ( 7 ) . He ever compared his life to others and dreamed of things his low parents were incapable of giving him even in his wildest dreams. This outlook caused Griffiths to turn up ever desiring more than he could hold, ever desiring the best out at that place even if he knew he could nt hold it. Turning up, and eventually populating in t he metropolis where Griffith s aspirations of illustriousness could eventually be achieved, he one time and for all felt at place. He took a occupation as a bellboy at a fancy hotel, and from here on he became haunted with seeking to travel up to the high ranks of society. Griffiths shortly begins his relationships with the two adult females that will finally take to his ruin. When Griffiths finds out Roberta is pregnant, he sees his life faux pas off, and he knows that life with Sondra will be much better, so he does the unthinkable, putting to deaths Roberta. For a adult male to kill the adult female transporting his kid must intend there was something awfully incorrect with that adult male, and at that place was. Griffiths was so caught up with his compulsion to the good life that he failed to recognize that he already had it. Griffith s compulsion was so complex that it non merely had the power to eventually give Griffiths everything he wanted, it besides had the power to take a way everything he s been working hard on accomplishing. Theodore Dreiser besides uses boding to convey his impossible dream subject. At the start of the narrative, Griffiths was portrayed as this hapless male child making anything possible to gain his topographic point in the high society. This dream Griffiths had led him to develop his compulsion and get down his backbreaking trek to the top. On one of his darks out with his freshly found friends, the driver of the auto hit a small miss ( 139 ) and everyone indoors flees the scene. This event sparks a sense of boding in the readers mind, and unleashes a ton of inquiry: Will he acquire off with it? , Will it go on once more? with this incident, Dreiser is able to do it clear that Griffiths compulsion is non a healthy one at all, for a adult male to fly the scene of an guiltless miss ran over, is a awful thing to make. It finally shows the readers that Griffiths is willing to put on the line everything he has to accomplish his high place in society. Later in life, when Roberta te lls Griffiths that she is pregnant ( 386 ) , the reader know that Griffiths will non let this to put him back from his dreams. Automatically, one begins to believe, will he make the same thing he did to the small miss? and to the reader s discouragement, our anticipations are right. When Clyde comes across the newspaper article inadvertent dual calamity at base on balls lake ( 456 ) the reader automatically assumes the worst: Clyde is be aftering a awful thing. Throughout the novel, the reader is able to in a manner predict Griffith s hereafter. His compulsion to what he ca nt hold is perilously present, and the reader knows Griffiths is willing to put on the line anything and everything to accomplish his dreams. 5. Decision In decision, Theodore Dreiser s An American Tragedy, to the full exemplifies his subject of sometimes dreams are impossible to accomplish. Because of its position, content, word picture, and its ability to capture an audience, An American Tragedy clearly exemplifies a high virtue for its literary facets. An American Tragedy symbolizes an unwellness that plagues our society today, that everyone will accomplish success no affair the obstructions put in their way. The world is that there are fortunes out at that place that will automatically stop your journey to success, and Dreiser does an outstanding occupation of conveying them to visible radiation. It is because of this consequence wholly good as its captivating content, which leaves readers unwilling to put the fresh down, that makes An American Tragedy a perfect campaigner for a work of literary virtue, stand foring literature at its best.

Descartes

Descartes Descartes Descartes insists that there is no analogy between walking and thinking since the notions of a walk and a thought are different in essence. Following the philosopher, one can claim that a walk is nothing but the act of walking, i.e. a physical human ability, which does not require any mental efforts and exists independently from the mind. A thought, on the contrary, is a broader notion since it can be applied at three distinct levels: it may refer to the faculty, to the thing, which possesses the faculty, and to the act itself. From this standpoint, Descartes endows a thought with the potential for a broader circle of functions. However, he does not exclude the possibility that a thought may stand for the act of walking or the ability to walk, which makes his distinction rather vague. In simple terms, there is really no analogy between walking and thinking since the first is a physical process and the second a mental, but Descartes complicates the matter. Saying that a thought may stand for the act of walking or the ability to walk, he admits that both notions can be equal, at the same time rejecting this. Further, the philosopher argues that he can be sure only about his thoughts rather than any actions. Metaphysical certainty, in this case, should imply a human cognitive ability to make logical inferences, i.e. the cogito, and it is embarrassing why he is sure about his thoughts and unsure about his actions as if the latter were not controlled or predetermined by our brain. Probably, Descartes position is defensible if one considers his arguments in the Second Meditation, where he wonders if there is any absolutely certain truth. He gives an affirmative answer since even if his experience is illusory, it is still real because it takes place. Therefore, the person who experiences really exists. The single argument proving that the philosopher exists is that he is thinking (or experiencing), which presupposes that he is a thing that experiences (thinks) a mind. Descartes knows for sure that he is a mind since he is not yet sure if his body and the physical world exist. What is more, he is more certain that his mind exists since exactly the intellect represents a truthful state of physical things, and the senses themselves are unable to do it (Descartes). As Descartes exemplifies the matter, even if he seems to himself to be walking, his body may not move at all, as in dreams. Consequently, we should trust our mind rather than our senses. It follows from this that if Descartes considers walking as a sensual experience, he may not make the inference I am walking, therefore I exist, unless the awareness of walking is a thought. In the given context, it is noteworthy to mention Descartes ideas about mind/body dualism. According to the philosopher, a human is a distinctly thinking thing. Although he, as every human, does have a body, with which he [his mind] is tightly connected and which is an unthinking thing, he [his mind] is entirely different from his body and may exist without it (Descartes 5). The philosopher exemplifies how his body is intimately conjoined with his mind: when his body is hurt, he does not perceive the wound by the understanding alone but feels pain; likewise, he feels hungry or thirsty when his body needs food or drink. Therefore, there exists the union and apparent fusion of mind and body (Descartes 7). Despite this apparent fusion, another difference between the mind and body is that the body is inherently divisible, whereas the mind is completely indivisible. Indeed, Descartes can think of distinct parts of his body like foot, arm, head, etc., but he can distinguish no parts in him self as a thinking thing. One more distinctive feature is that the mind receives the immediate impression not from all the parts of the body but only from the brain or some its part. Movements of the brain, in turn, immediately impress the mind only with that sensation which is the most important at the moment. Nevertheless, such distinction between the mind and body seems rather vague to me. Descartes rejects the idea of a thinking body, claiming that he is a mind. It looks like he disregards the fact that human brain is a physical entity, and exactly this physical entity enables humans to think, which makes his argument unconvincing. To make his standpoint more convincing, and, therefore, rebut Hobbes and Gassendis arguments in a more reasonable way, he should explain his position in terms of rationalism. Rationalism argues that a person is born already with knowledge, i.e. knowledge is inherent, and learning stems from intuition. Following Rationalists like Plato and Descartes, who are concerned with absolute universal truths, one can assert that the mind is the single source of knowledge (Empiricism v. Rationalism. n.d.; Rationalism: Some similarities between Plato and Descartes, 17 Mar. 2001). In this connection, it becomes clear why Descartes argues that there is no analogy between walking and thinking and why a person is a thinking thing. Nonetheless, a person can walk, breathe, or eat without thinking, i.e. he or she can perform purely physiological functions without thinking. If, however, one starts to think what to eat or where to go (or in which direction), these actions become impossible without thinking. Likewise, a person can think without doing anything; the only prerequisite for thinking is being alive. All in all, such questions are rather entangled and seem to be of a little practical value. The issues mentioned above may be good for philosophers, who aim at discovering human essence, but ordinary people are not likely to ponder on them.

Alevel chemistry Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Alevel chemistry - Essay Example The forward reaction (the production of ammonia) is exothermic. According to Le Chatelier's Principle, this will be favored if you lower the temperature. The system will respond by moving the position of equilibrium to counteract this - in other words by producing more heat. In order to get as much ammonia as possible in the equilibrium mixture, you need as low a temperature as possible. The lower the temperature you use, the slower the reaction becomes. A manufacturer is trying to produce as much ammonia as possible per day. It makes no sense to try to achieve an equilibrium mixture which contains a very high proportion of ammonia if it takes several years for the reaction to reach that equilibrium. You need the gases to reach equilibrium within the very short time that they will be in contact with the catalyst in the reactor. Therefore 400 - 450C is a compromise temperature producing a reasonably high proportion of ammonia in the equilibrium mixture (even if it is only 15%), but in a very short time. According to Le Chatelier's Principle, if you increase the pressure the system will respond by favoring the reaction which produces fewer molecules. That will cause the pressure to fall again. In order to get as much ammonia as possible in the equilibrium mixture, you need as high a pressure as possible. 200 atmospheres is a high pressure. Increasing the pressure brings the molecules closer together. In this particular instance, it will increase their chances of hitting and sticking to the surface of the catalyst where they can react. The higher the pressure the better in terms of the rate of a gas reaction. 200 atmospheres is a compromise pressure chosen on economic grounds. If the pressure used is too high, the cost of generating it exceeds the price you can get for the extra ammonia produced. Catalyst: It is explained below. Q4. Catalyst (with theory about its mechanism) The catalyst has no affect whatsoever on the position of the equilibrium. Adding a catalyst doesn't produce any greater percentage of ammonia in the equilibrium mixture. Its only function is to speed up the reaction. In the